MyDefence: Company Profile
Danish counter-UAS specialist MyDefence secures $26M U.S. Army contract and expands globally with RF-centric C-UAS systems validated across NATO, U.S., and APAC defense markets.
- $26M U.S. Army Contract July 2025
- 4,500+ Systems Fielded Across 100+ customers; company-reported
- 115 Employees
- 5 Operational Hubs Denmark, Oklahoma City, UK-EU, Singapore, plus March 2026 U.S. production facility
- HQ
- Nørresundby, Denmark
- Founded
- 2013
- Employees
- 115
- Competitors
- DroneShield·Anduril·Raytheon Technologies·Thales
MyDefence Secures $26M U.S. Army Contract as RF-Centric C-UAS Portfolio Gains Five Eyes Traction
The Danish counter-UAS specialist has converted battlefield lessons from Ukraine into validated military contracts across three major defense markets — but scaling a 115-person company through tenfold capacity expansion while competing against defense primes will define the next 24 months.
Business Overview
MyDefence, headquartered in Denmark, develops and manufactures RF-based counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) for military, law enforcement, and critical infrastructure customers. The company’s commercial footprint has expanded materially since mid-2024: a NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) agreement in August 2024 opened allied-nation procurement channels across Europe; a $26M U.S. Army order followed in July 2025; and selection for Australia’s LAND 156 Counter-Drone Program in September 2025 established a foothold in the APAC defense market.
The company reports 4,500+ systems fielded across 100+ customers — a figure that, if accurate (LOW CONFIDENCE, company-reported only), represents a meaningful installed base for a firm of its size. A separate claim of “doubled earnings” in mid-2025 lacks audited baseline data and cannot be independently verified.
Operationally, MyDefence has moved from a single-site model to a five-hub structure: Denmark (HQ), Oklahoma City (R&D and production), a UK-EU counter-drone hub, and Singapore for APAC support. Local U.S. production, announced October 2025 and formalized with an Oklahoma City facility in March 2026, is a direct response to domestic content preferences in U.S. defense procurement.
Signal Activity — MyDefence
Competitive Positioning — MyDefence
Technology Portfolio
MyDefence’s product stack is RF-centric throughout, spanning detection, electronic attack, and software intelligence layers. All eight products in the current portfolio carry fielded deployment status.
| Product | Platform | Primary Role | Notable Spec |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wingman | Handheld | Soldier-borne RF detection | Wearable, dismounted |
| Pitbull | Handheld | Soldier-borne jamming (EA) | Wearable, pairs with Wingman |
| Wideband Antenna | Sensor | RF front-end coverage | Ukraine-informed spectrum breadth |
| WideBand XF Antenna | Sensor | Enhanced RF front-end | Oct 2025 upgrade over Wideband |
| Spectrum Warrior | Software | AI-powered RF detection | Reduced operator workload in dense RF |
| Custom Drone Library | Software | Drone intelligence dataset | Updateable variant/countermeasure profiles |
| Vehicle-Mounted C-UAS | Fixed | Convoy/mobile protection | On-the-move RF detection |
| Perimeter/Fixed-Site Suite | Fixed | Base/infrastructure defense | Multi-sensor persistent coverage |
The Wingman/Pitbull pairing for dismounted soldiers — wearable RF detector plus electronic attack module — represents the company’s most differentiated niche. Size, weight, and power (SWaP) constraints in soldier-borne applications create genuine barriers to entry that larger, heavier systems from defense primes cannot easily overcome.
The October 2024 Spectrum Warrior launch and the September 2025 Custom Drone Library reflect a deliberate software layer strategy: operational data from 4,500+ deployed systems feeds drone signature intelligence that compounds over time. The wideband antenna iterations (May and October 2025) are explicitly shaped by Ukraine battlefield feedback on frequency-hopping and low-altitude drone tactics — a product development loop that pure-play software firms and defense primes with less tactical proximity cannot easily replicate at the same cadence.
Market Position
MyDefence occupies a CONTENDER rating with a NARROW moat. The company has demonstrated genuine product-market fit in the soldier-borne and vehicle-mounted RF C-UAS subsegments, validated by Tier-1 procurement outcomes. However, the competitive landscape is structurally challenging.
Defense primes — Raytheon Technologies, Thales, Elbit Systems, Leonardo — bring multi-domain integration depth and existing program-of-record relationships that MyDefence cannot match at current scale. Well-funded pure-play C-UAS firms, notably DroneShield (ASX-listed, audited financials) and Anduril (with its Lattice platform and kinetic effector integration), compete directly in the military C-UAS segment with greater capitalization and broader sensor fusion capabilities.
MyDefence’s RF-centric portfolio is also constrained in civilian markets: active jamming is prohibited or heavily restricted in most Western jurisdictions outside military contexts, limiting addressable market for the Pitbull and vehicle-mounted configurations to defense and law enforcement customers.
The NSPA agreement and Five Eyes procurement wins (U.S. Army, Australian LAND 156) create meaningful switching costs and incumbency advantages for follow-on orders — the most durable competitive position available to a specialist of this size.
Outlook
Three catalysts will determine whether MyDefence consolidates its CONTENDER position or faces margin compression from larger competitors. First, full execution of the $26M U.S. Army order without quality or delivery failures is essential — for a 115-person company managing tenfold capacity expansion simultaneously, this is a material execution risk. Second, progression through LAND 156 milestones toward a production contract would validate APAC market entry and provide a second Tier-1 reference customer. Third, independent test and evaluation results — U.S. DoD T&E data or NATO STANAG compliance documentation — would provide third-party performance validation that currently relies entirely on company-reported claims (MODERATE CONFIDENCE overall for performance assertions).
Acquisition interest from a defense prime seeking proven tactical C-UAS subsystem capabilities remains a plausible medium-term outcome, given the company’s demonstrated traction, installed base, and manageable size. Investors and procurement officers conducting diligence should prioritize requests for audited financials, named executive leadership disclosure, and independent performance validation data — none of which are currently available in public materials.