Deployment Assessment: Goma International Airport

Site Overview

Goma International Airport (IATA: GOM) is the primary air gateway for eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, serving a metropolitan population of 645,172 within 5 km and 1.7 million within 25 km. Operated under the authority of the Régie des Voies Aériennes (RVA), the airport functions as the critical logistics node for humanitarian operations, UN peacekeeping resupply (MONUSCO), and commercial traffic across the Great Lakes region. Its runway and apron infrastructure sits adjacent to Lake Kivu and within proximity of the Nyiragongo volcanic corridor — a compounding physical hazard that elevates subsurface risk scores to 11.1, the highest sub-score in this profile.

The airport is located in an active conflict zone. Eastern DRC has experienced sustained armed group activity, including M23/AFC operations that resulted in the fall of Goma to rebel forces in January 2025. That political-military context defines the operational environment for any autonomous systems deployment: the site is not a peacetime airport with elevated threat posture — it is a contested logistics node in an active theater.

The absence of deployed systems against this threat profile is the primary procurement signal in this assessment.

---

CARVER/DRES Findings

CARVER Composite: 37/50. This is a high-priority target profile. The two dominant drivers are Recognizability (9/10) and Criticality (8/10), both reflecting the airport's status as the sole international air gateway for a region with no viable road or rail alternative for time-sensitive cargo. Effect scores (8/10) confirm that disruption cascades immediately into humanitarian supply chains, medical evacuation capacity, and UN logistics. Recuperability (3/10) is the single mitigating factor — the airport has demonstrated some resilience through prior disruptions — but this score should be read cautiously given the current political control situation.

DRES Composite: 6.6 (MEDIUM). The composite understates specific sub-domain exposures. Subsurface risk (11.1) reflects volcanic and seismic hazard from the Nyiragongo system, which has caused lava flows reaching the airport perimeter as recently as 2021. Ground threat score (7.6) reflects the airport's exposure to direct-fire and indirect-fire threats from armed groups operating in the urban and peri-urban envelope. Air threat score (4.1) is moderate — not because aerial threats are absent, but because the threat model in this environment is dominated by ground-based armed actors rather than dedicated drone operators. That assessment may shift as FPV drone proliferation accelerates among non-state actors in the region.

Hardening score (11.134) is the highest individual sub-score in the profile and reflects the airport's physical construction and perimeter infrastructure. This is a relative measure — hardening is meaningful against small-arms and indirect fire, not against runway incursion, drone overflight, or insider threat vectors.

---

Verified Deployments: A Critical Finding

Zero verified autonomous or robotic systems deployments are recorded for this site.

For a CARVER-37 site in an active conflict zone with 645,000 people within 5 km, the absence of any confirmed C-UAS, perimeter surveillance robotics, or autonomous runway inspection capability is a material security gap — not a data artifact. This finding is publishable on its own terms.

The robotics gap classification is listed as UNKNOWN, which means no public evidence exists either confirming or ruling out deployment. In practice, for a site under the operational control of armed non-state actors as of early 2025, the probability of systematic autonomous systems deployment by civilian airport authorities is low. UN and NGO operators active at the site (WFP, MSF, UNHAS) have not publicly disclosed C-UAS or perimeter robotics procurement for Goma specifically.

Comparable regional airports with active UN peacekeeping footprints — including Bangui M'Poko (CAR) and Aden Adde International (Somalia) — have seen limited C-UAS deployment under MINUSCA and AMISOM frameworks respectively, but these deployments are not systematically documented and do not constitute a verified baseline for Goma.

The absence of deployed systems against this threat profile is the primary procurement signal in this assessment.

---

Threat Exposure: Next 12–24 Months

FPV and commercial drone proliferation. The conflict environment in eastern DRC has seen documented use of commercial drones for reconnaissance by multiple armed factions. FPV drone use for direct attack, while not yet confirmed at Goma airport specifically, is consistent with the trajectory of non-state actor capability development observed in comparable theaters (Ukraine, Sudan, Sahel). The airport's open apron geometry and proximity to dense urban terrain make it geometrically accessible to low-altitude drone incursion from multiple vectors.

Runway and apron security. With a CARVER Accessibility score of 4/10 (restricted airside, large landside perimeter), the airport's primary vulnerability is not the terminal building but the runway environment itself. Foreign object debris (FOD) detection, perimeter breach detection, and taxiway surveillance are unaddressed by any verified system. For an airport handling humanitarian airlift under contested conditions, a single runway incursion event — whether by armed actors, displaced civilians, or drone — has immediate operational consequences.

Volcanic and seismic monitoring. The subsurface DRES score of 11.1 is driven by Nyiragongo. The 2021 eruption caused lava flows that reached the airport perimeter and forced temporary closure. Autonomous ground sensor networks and aerial monitoring platforms for volcanic hazard are not deployed at the site per available evidence. This is a non-conflict threat with a documented, near-term recurrence probability that robotic monitoring systems could directly address.

Humanitarian operator procurement. UNHAS (UN Humanitarian Air Service) is the dominant operator for humanitarian flights at Goma. FEMA C-UAS grant frameworks do not apply in this jurisdiction, but UNDSS (UN Department of Safety and Security) and UNMAS (UN Mine Action Service) have procurement authority for counter-drone and perimeter security systems at UN-supported airports. Any procurement signal from UNMAS or UNDSS for eastern DRC should be tracked as a leading indicator.

---

Procurement Implications

Domain	Gap	Applicable System Category	Procurement Authority
C-UAS	No verified deployment	RF detection + defeat, passive EO/IR	UNMAS, UNDSS, RVA
Perimeter surveillance	No verified deployment	Fixed-wing UAS patrol, ground radar	MONUSCO, RVA
Runway FOD detection	No verified deployment	Autonomous ground vehicle, fixed sensor	RVA, ICAO technical assistance
Volcanic monitoring	No verified deployment	Seismic sensor networks, aerial survey UAS	OCHA, scientific programs

MODERATE CONFIDENCE that UNMAS or a comparable UN body will issue a tender for counter-drone capability at one or more eastern DRC airports within 18 months, driven by FPV proliferation in the theater and pressure from humanitarian operators. LOW CONFIDENCE on timing and whether Goma specifically will be the primary site versus Bunia or Kindu.

---

Summary Assessment

Goma International Airport scores 37/50 on CARVER and 6.6 on DRES, placing it in the top tier of regional infrastructure targets by combined criticality and threat exposure. It sits in an active conflict zone, serves 1.7 million people within 25 km, and has zero verified autonomous systems deployments across all domains — C-UAS, perimeter, runway, and environmental monitoring. The volcanic hazard layer (subsurface DRES 11.1) adds a non-conflict threat vector that is also unaddressed by any recorded robotic or sensor system.

The procurement gap is real, the threat environment is deteriorating, and the humanitarian operator base (UNHAS, MSF, WFP) provides a credible procurement pathway outside standard national defense channels. For vendors, grant applicants, and program managers tracking C-UAS and autonomous perimeter systems in conflict-adjacent humanitarian contexts, Goma represents an unaddressed requirement with documented urgency.

Confidence: MODERATE | Assessment Valid Until: 2027-04-29

---

Assessment based on CIDE-CD-TRANS-00003 site profile, ACLED conflict data, ICAO airport records, and open-source reporting on DRC conflict dynamics. No classified sources consulted. Deployment table reflects public evidence only — absence of entry does not confirm absence of capability.