Deployment Assessment: Baghdad International Airport / New Al Muthana Air Base

Site Overview

Baghdad International Airport (BIAP), co-located with New Al Muthana Air Base, is Iraq's primary international aviation gateway and a dual-use civil-military facility operating under the Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority and Iraqi Air Force jurisdiction. The airport handles the majority of Iraq's international passenger and cargo traffic and serves as a logistics hub for coalition and commercial operations across the country. Its co-location with an active military airfield elevates its strategic profile beyond that of a standard commercial airport.

The site sits approximately 16 km west of central Baghdad, placing it within the urban-suburban fringe of a metropolitan area of approximately 5.4 million people within 25 km. Disruption to BIAP is not a local event — it is a national economic and security event.

The combination of conflict-zone status, CARVER 44, and zero confirmed C-UAS deployments defines the core risk exposure.

CARVER composite of 37/50 places this site in the top tier of assessed infrastructure targets globally. Recognizability scores 9/10 — BIAP is a universally known landmark with persistent symbolic and operational value to state and non-state actors alike. Criticality and Effect both score 8/10, reflecting the airport's role as an irreplaceable node in Iraq's transport and logistics network.

---

DRES Assessment: What the Scores Mean Operationally

The DRES composite of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects a site with significant multi-domain exposure, but the sub-score distribution tells the operational story more precisely.

Air domain (4.6): Moderate air threat exposure. This is lower than expected for a conflict-zone airport, likely reflecting existing airspace control measures and the presence of military aviation assets on the co-located base. However, a score of 4.6 still represents meaningful small UAS and rocket/mortar threat exposure — categories that have historically targeted BIAP and similar Iraqi facilities.

Ground domain (13.4): Elevated. Large landside perimeters, vehicle access points, and the transition zones between civil and military areas create persistent ground-level exposure. The CARVER Accessibility score of 4/10 reflects restricted airside access, but landside perimeter length at a facility of this scale is a structural vulnerability that access controls alone cannot fully address.

Subsurface (15.7) and Hardening (15.66): These are the highest sub-scores in the profile and warrant direct operator attention. Subsurface exposure at this level at an airport/air base complex typically reflects infrastructure density — fuel lines, utilities, taxiway substrates — combined with hardening that is present but not comprehensive. The convergence of high subsurface exposure and high hardening scores suggests a facility that has invested in above-ground protection while leaving subsurface infrastructure as a residual vulnerability.

Target Profile (13.41): Consistent with a facility that is both operationally critical and symbolically prominent. This score, combined with Recognizability of 9/10, indicates BIAP will remain a priority target for any actor seeking maximum operational or propaganda effect.

---

Verified Deployments: A Critical Finding

No verified autonomous or robotic system deployments are recorded for this site.

This is a primary finding, not a data gap. For a site scoring CARVER 37/50 in an active conflict zone, the absence of public evidence of deployed C-UAS, perimeter robotics, runway FOD detection systems, or autonomous surveillance platforms represents a material security posture gap — or, alternatively, a classification posture that prevents public confirmation.

Both interpretations carry operational implications:

• If no systems are deployed: BIAP is operating a CARVER-37 facility in a conflict-zone environment without autonomous threat detection or perimeter robotics. Given the DRES Ground score of 13.4 and the landside perimeter exposure, this is an actionable gap.
• If systems are deployed but unconfirmed: The absence of public evidence limits allied coordination, grant documentation, and procurement benchmarking. It also means this assessment cannot credit existing capability — the operational posture is invisible to open-source analysis.

Either finding supports immediate procurement action or public documentation of existing capability.

This site scores 7/10 on robotics applicability (a standalone, non-CARVER measure), independently flagging it as a priority candidate for perimeter drone detection, runway FOD robotics, and security robot deployment. The gap between that score and zero confirmed deployments is the central procurement signal of this assessment.

---

Threat Exposure and Attack History

No attack events are recorded against this specific site in the assessment dataset. This requires careful interpretation.

BIAP has a documented historical attack record — the facility has been targeted by rocket and mortar fire, and the broader Baghdad area has experienced persistent indirect fire and drone activity from non-state actors. The ACLED incidents within 50 km reading of 0 in this dataset likely reflects a specific time-window or data scope rather than a genuine absence of threat activity in the region. Operators should not interpret this figure as a clean threat environment.

The conflict zone designation (YES) is the controlling variable. Iraq's security environment as of early 2026 includes active militia networks with demonstrated UAS capability, including one-way attack drones (OWADs) and FPV platforms. The combination of conflict-zone status, CARVER 37, and zero confirmed C-UAS deployments defines the core risk exposure.

Population at risk within 25 km: 5,390,589. A successful attack on BIAP's fuel infrastructure, runway systems, or terminal complex would generate cascading effects across Baghdad's population and Iraq's national aviation network. The Effect score of 8/10 is consistent with this exposure.

---

Procurement and Deployment Implications: 12–24 Month Outlook

C-UAS: The most immediate procurement priority. Conflict-zone airports with DRES Air scores above 4.0 and no confirmed C-UAS represent a standard procurement trigger under FEMA C-UAS grant frameworks and DoD partner-nation security assistance programs. Layered detection — RF sensing, radar, electro-optical — is the baseline requirement. Kinetic defeat options at a co-located civil-military facility require careful legal and safety analysis given the 91,783 population within 5 km.

Perimeter robotics: DRES Ground of 13.4 and CARVER Accessibility of 4 together indicate a perimeter that is access-controlled but not autonomously monitored. Ground surveillance robots and autonomous perimeter patrol platforms are directly applicable. The landside/airside transition zone is the priority deployment area.

Runway FOD detection: Standard for large international airports; the absence of confirmed deployment at BIAP is notable. Autonomous FOD detection systems (camera-equipped ground robots or fixed sensor arrays) reduce runway incursion risk and are operationally justified independent of the conflict-zone threat environment.

Subsurface monitoring: The subsurface DRES score of 15.7 is the highest individual sub-score in this profile. Autonomous inspection platforms for fuel lines, utility conduits, and taxiway infrastructure are a medium-term procurement priority. This is a less visible but structurally significant gap.

Funding pathways: FEMA C-UAS grant programs, DoD Foreign Military Financing (FMF) for Iraqi security forces, and USAID infrastructure security programs are the primary funding vectors for a site of this profile. The dual civil-military nature of BIAP creates eligibility across multiple program lines.

---

Summary Assessment

BIAP/New Al Muthana presents a CARVER-37, DRES-7.1 target profile with zero confirmed autonomous system deployments in a declared conflict zone. The site's recognizability (9/10), criticality (8/10), and effect scores (8/10) place it among the highest-priority unprotected infrastructure nodes in this dataset. The subsurface hardening gap (15.7) and ground perimeter exposure (13.4) are the two most actionable technical findings. The 12–24 month procurement priority sequence is: C-UAS detection layer → perimeter robotics → runway FOD → subsurface inspection.

Confidence: MODERATE — CARVER/DRES scores are well-supported by site characteristics and regional threat data. Zero confirmed deployments reflects absence of public evidence; classified or undisclosed systems may exist. Attack history data requires supplementation from ACLED and open-source Iraqi security reporting for full threat picture.

Assessment Valid Until: 2027-04-24

---